Bench Footing vs. Underpinning: Which is Better for London Basements?

Last reviewed: April 17, 2026 | Editorial team: London Legal Basements Research Desk | Primary sources: City of London, Ontario Building Code, LTB.

If your basement ceiling is under 1.95m (6'5"), your secondary suite fails the Ontario Building Code (OBC). To legally rent the unit, you must lower the concrete floor. In London, this leaves property investors with two structural choices: Bench Footing or Underpinning.

Quick answer

Underpinning is the more expensive, space-efficient option. Bench footing is usually the faster and cheaper option, but it gives up floor area. The right choice depends on your target rent, footprint, and whether the asset needs a clean sale story or maximum livable square footage.

What is Underpinning?

Underpinning involves excavating below the existing foundation wall (typically 1.2m deep) and pouring new concrete directly beneath it in sequenced sections.

What is a Bench Footing?

A bench footing leaves the original foundation intact and builds a reinforced concrete "bench" inward along the perimeter. This bench is typically 0.5m wide and 1.0m high.

Deep Dive: Lowering your floor is just one part of meeting the OBC. You must also account for egress windows and fire separations. Read our complete Guide to Meeting the 1.95m OBC Rule, review the OBC Fire Separation Guide, or check your window dimensions using our Free Egress Calculator.

Related Compliance Guides

Put the structural decision in the full permit context

Before pricing concrete, confirm whether zoning, egress, fire separation, mechanical upgrades and permit drawings make the overall project viable.

Run the Legalization Readiness Check

Download the OBC Planning PDF

Review the exact architectural diagrams for underpinning and egress. Enter your email to download the official OBC Basement Planning Guide PDF.